I have a little gripe with that and please feel free to shred it to pieces anyone – the equation is a representation of something that already exists! So the physical reality knew or rather has everything intrinsically we just discover it and explain it to others. Just this episode of Closer to Truth by Robert L Kuhn keeps coming back to me – Is Math and beauty intrinsic or imposed?
I like how you can have faith in the equation to show you something you cannot see. “By faith we understand that the universe was created by the word of God, so that what is seen was not made out of things that are visible.” (Hebrews 11:3)
I like how you can have faith in the equation to show you something you cannot see. “By faith we understand that the universe was created by the word of God, so that what is seen was not made out of things that are visible.” (Hebrews 11:3)
This is an idealisation of science that does not really exist. When you look back at the history of the creation of these sorts of equations, you'll find that they often failed to predict very little. Take Newton's mechanics for example, you can read in Thomas Khun's "structure of scientific revolutions" that there was a huge amount of work and fiddling needed to make his equations predict anything beyond the most rudimentary stuff. The equations most certainly did not know it all along, people had to modify them with air resistance and all sorts of not so nice imperfections to get accurate predictions of reality.
The success, came not from the fact that the equations somehow intrinsically had this predictive power in them (they evidently did not), but that people really liked them because they unified a lot of previously distinct things, and were convinced that the equations did know it all along. A kind of self fulfilling prophecy, so put in the work to make the equations work.
If you want to know about what physics is on the grander scale, ironically, don't ask a physicist. They only know about this idealised version presented in the textbooks. Instead, ask a historian of physics like khun.
This is one of the coolest shorts I've ever seen in my entire life. Physics has been my side passion ever since I majored in college. I never got to finish that degree but learning to see the world like a physicist changed my life
The math is neither smart or dumb, it's math, a description of the physical universe. The math does not define the universe, the universe defines the math – even math we've not discovered yet.
MeTAtron's MAtriX3x3 OM'E… "The All is Mind; the Universe is Mental." "As above, so below; as below, so above.” "Nothing rests; everything moves; everything vibrates."
Everything is ALLMIND369 OVEONE IAM=O=QuantuM⚖️ ALLMIND IN 3in1MINDS Body Spirit OVE light*3÷7 color*3÷7 sound*3÷7.. infinite all mind in Trinity every thought has an opposite charge of itself. ♂️+01=0=-01♀️ Riding the waves through our moments in equilibrium is A NEW beginning in masteRING3X369 of our OWN each individual unique complete Immaculate conceived MIND 1IN3💚3IN1 of IAM 1LOVES Light3 3 above our heArt 3 below 7 sums
7SUMS CREATION ALLMIND frequency vibration in THOUGHTS charge
MC² in WAVES OVE 3SOUNDs7 1Frequency. … Amplitude. … 2Timbre. … Envelope. … ***3Velocity. … Wavelength. … Phase =SUM.7 3
Lights7: 1 radio waves,÷ microwaves, 2infrared (IR)÷ visible light, ***3ultraviolet ÷ X-rays Sum Gamma rays SUM7x 6 COLORs 7 1 Red÷ Orange 2Yellow÷ Green ***3. Blue÷ Indigo SUM Violet SUM7 9 In seven colors seven notes seven lights in infinite divisions ALL TOGETHER Creating all living systems, Creating All living bodies, Creating all gravity, Creating all matter.. IN ElectroMAGnetic geometrical symmetrical fractal order
HerMEs TrisMAjistus THOTH TimesFaceInEnergy Thoth me Light Never Dies death is our illusion through the terrible twos of childhood in Mercy Mercy Me and our promise rest is real..
Prisoners law in three power three sets all captives free 3Consciousness says I see you Mirror Mirror I see me wisdoms wisdom's wisdoms unconditional love and forgiveness is key ⚖️ EnKi 🗝
I think the criticism the British Royal Society offered the mathematician Ramanujan was that the equations he put out there were not derived through an elaborate mathematical method, and they asked him to derive them. So he sat down with the British mathematician G H Hardy to prove some of what he articulated as equations.
I do not see this same criticism being applied to Einstein.
By the way mathematicians today are at work even today proving both Ramanujan’s equations & Einstein’s equations.
As a Tamil Hindu Brahmin, Ramanujan had a spiritual bent of mind. He would say that the goddess Namagiri would inspire him to formulate these equations.
In both Einstein & Ramanujan’s cases, I do not think they could humanly using their physical brains derive these complex equations, many of which are now proven correct. Perhaps Ramanujan was right about an extraneous paranormal force guiding him to formulate these ultra complex, multidimensional equations.
The most important 3 degrees of motion in human history is that Newton put it together, and when you do what he did, it speaks a beautiful language also . But of 1st position Newton 2nd Einstein 3rd sir bacon reorientate bottom up inside out ( Richard finneman) so well articulated about what can be asked about a system and certain precautions can be said or predicted
This is the problem with physics these days, we over rely on equations and the science of experimental discovery seems to have been lost. I have a big problem with theories where assumptions are made then simply built upon again and again with little thought about the validity of those assumptions. When I studied physics back in the day ! , there was a big focus on experimental verification. I am saddened by the new RIDICULOUS theories coning out of the mouths of so called respected physicists, e.g. we live in a giant computer simulation or that there are multiple universes each with a different version of us in them ! I cannot believe physicists have let these people run with these stupid ideas which have no basis other than in science fiction movies. Why is a science pandering to Hollywood?
There are NO BLACK HOLES …THERE ARE NO GRAVITY WAVES …ELECTRONS TRAVEL IN THEIR ORBITS AT (π÷2) x speed of LIGHT (PHOTONS) ….THEIR IS NO NORTH or SOUTH POLE …MAGNETISM IS THE EFFECT OF OBJECTS with MASS TRAVELING IN A CIRCLE/ORBIT …LEFT HAND GENERATOR RULE ….GRAVITY IS NOT AN ATTRACTION …IT IS A PUSH BY PARTICLES 7 to 8 times smaller then electrons ….electron mass is 1 ÷ 1836.1526745 x10¹⁸ lighter then a PROTON …..AREA COVERED BY AN ELECTRON = 1,836.1526745 x AREA PROTON ….describing a 2 DIMENSIONAL OBJECT ….or ….A PROTON IS A CONDENSED VERSION OF ELECTRONS ….MASS ELECTRONS/ MASS PROTONS = AREA PROTONS/AREA ELECTRONS ….GRAVITY IS A "PUSH" BY tinier particles …THIS "PUSH" CAN BE REDUCED BY Permanent MAGNETS or electric coil magnets (ELECTRO MAGNETS ) ….
Something to consider: Theoretical science usually goes by finding missing pieces of math. For example, the formula for gravity is essentially the same as electrostatics (magnets and particles) on the law of attraction where it gets exponentially larger the closer two attractive/repelling forces are with the difference being gravity must have a much larger scale to have the same force as magnets/particles. Where the theory goes is that you have positive and negative charges in electrostatics, but you only have one type of known force for gravity, meaning that there should technically be a pushing force of gravity, which is where we get our ideas of cloaking devices and more recently, our ideas of UFO/advanced propulsion.
"bla bla bla, send money" -today's "scientist"
I have a little gripe with that and please feel free to shred it to pieces anyone – the equation is a representation of something that already exists! So the physical reality knew or rather has everything intrinsically we just discover it and explain it to others. Just this episode of Closer to Truth by Robert L Kuhn keeps coming back to me – Is Math and beauty intrinsic or imposed?
Search Mindscape. Dr Carroll has discussions on everything. It’s great.
God if you were only a little more flexible in your thinking. You are so clever, materialism is not an intellectual statement. It is a dogmatism.
I like how you can have faith in the equation to show you something you cannot see. “By faith we understand that the universe was created by the word of God, so that what is seen was not made out of things that are visible.” (Hebrews 11:3)
I like how you can have faith in the equation to show you something you cannot see. “By faith we understand that the universe was created by the word of God, so that what is seen was not made out of things that are visible.” (Hebrews 11:3)
This is an idealisation of science that does not really exist. When you look back at the history of the creation of these sorts of equations, you'll find that they often failed to predict very little. Take Newton's mechanics for example, you can read in Thomas Khun's "structure of scientific revolutions" that there was a huge amount of work and fiddling needed to make his equations predict anything beyond the most rudimentary stuff. The equations most certainly did not know it all along, people had to modify them with air resistance and all sorts of not so nice imperfections to get accurate predictions of reality.
The success, came not from the fact that the equations somehow intrinsically had this predictive power in them (they evidently did not), but that people really liked them because they unified a lot of previously distinct things, and were convinced that the equations did know it all along. A kind of self fulfilling prophecy, so put in the work to make the equations work.
If you want to know about what physics is on the grander scale, ironically, don't ask a physicist. They only know about this idealised version presented in the textbooks. Instead, ask a historian of physics like khun.
einstein was one of the people who predicted black holes.
This is one of the coolest shorts I've ever seen in my entire life. Physics has been my side passion ever since I majored in college. I never got to finish that degree but learning to see the world like a physicist changed my life
This is actually kind of an incredible idea. To learn more, understand what we already know.
I really like calling an equation a “Little concrete poem”
I think we can boil this down to; "once you find out the rules of how one thing works, you can extrapolate."
The equation describes what we see. It's not necessarily the whole picture.
Ceket: Başkaları konuşur denklemler yapar
Why not white holes? Does everything have to be black
The math is neither smart or dumb, it's math, a description of the physical universe. The math does not define the universe, the universe defines the math – even math we've not discovered yet.
The math and the universe are truly beautiful, I only wish I were smart enough to understand either.
String theory is slow to be useful. 😊
The Webb telescope is destroying the LCDM cosmology.
And if it doesn't fit with the equation then we just disregard it, and invent some woo.
MeTAtron's MAtriX3x3 OM'E…
"The All is Mind; the Universe is Mental." "As above, so below; as below, so above.”
"Nothing rests; everything moves; everything vibrates."
Everything is ALLMIND369 OVEONE IAM=O=QuantuM⚖️ ALLMIND IN 3in1MINDS Body Spirit OVE
light*3÷7 color*3÷7 sound*3÷7.. infinite all mind in Trinity every thought has an opposite charge of itself.
♂️+01=0=-01♀️
Riding the waves through our moments in equilibrium is A NEW beginning in masteRING3X369 of our OWN each individual unique complete Immaculate conceived MIND
1IN3💚3IN1 of
IAM 1LOVES
Light3
3 above our heArt
3 below
7 sums
7SUMS CREATION ALLMIND frequency vibration in THOUGHTS charge
MC² in
WAVES OVE
3SOUNDs7
1Frequency. …
Amplitude. …
2Timbre. …
Envelope. …
***3Velocity. …
Wavelength. …
Phase =SUM.7
3
Lights7:
1 radio waves,÷
microwaves,
2infrared (IR)÷
visible light,
***3ultraviolet ÷
X-rays
Sum Gamma rays SUM7x
6
COLORs 7
1 Red÷
Orange
2Yellow÷
Green
***3. Blue÷
Indigo
SUM Violet
SUM7
9
In seven colors seven notes seven lights in infinite divisions ALL TOGETHER
Creating all living systems,
Creating All living bodies,
Creating all gravity,
Creating all matter.. IN
ElectroMAGnetic geometrical symmetrical fractal order
HerMEs TrisMAjistus
THOTH
TimesFaceInEnergy
Thoth me
Light Never Dies death is our illusion through the terrible twos of childhood in Mercy Mercy Me and our promise rest is real..
Prisoners law in three power three sets all captives free 3Consciousness says
I see you Mirror Mirror I see me wisdoms wisdom's wisdoms unconditional love and forgiveness is key ⚖️ EnKi 🗝
president vs prime minister kind of situation
And, systems are systems and need frequency or they will fall apart.
Big Bang…… RIP🎉
I think the criticism the British Royal Society offered the mathematician Ramanujan was that the equations he put out there were not derived through an elaborate mathematical method, and they asked him to derive them. So he sat down with the British mathematician G H Hardy to prove some of what he articulated as equations.
I do not see this same criticism being applied to Einstein.
By the way mathematicians today are at work even today proving both Ramanujan’s equations & Einstein’s equations.
As a Tamil Hindu Brahmin, Ramanujan had a spiritual bent of mind. He would say that the goddess Namagiri would inspire him to formulate these equations.
In both Einstein & Ramanujan’s cases, I do not think they could humanly using their physical brains derive these complex equations, many of which are now proven correct. Perhaps Ramanujan was right about an extraneous paranormal force guiding him to formulate these ultra complex, multidimensional equations.
The most important 3 degrees of motion in human history is that Newton put it together, and when you do what he did, it speaks a beautiful language also .
But of 1st position Newton 2nd Einstein 3rd sir bacon reorientate bottom up inside out ( Richard finneman) so well articulated about what can be asked about a system and certain precautions can be said or predicted
What law governs why these laws exist? Why should they work universally? How can you have laws without a lawgiver? Makes no sense.
The most fundamental thing about our universe is mathematical equations.
Math is a concept, not an object.
It is our unformed, and repeated experience that concepts are held in minds.
Therefore, a Mind must have brought the universe into existence.
One thing will always leads to another thing
Hence we have found blackholes, and we can use gravity to travel faster then light. Hence the galaxies formed faster then we expected.
This is the problem with physics these days, we over rely on equations and the science of experimental discovery seems to have been lost.
I have a big problem with theories where assumptions are made then simply built upon again and again with little thought about the validity of those assumptions.
When I studied physics back in the day ! , there was a big focus on experimental verification. I am saddened by the new RIDICULOUS theories coning out of the mouths of so called respected physicists, e.g. we live in a giant computer simulation or that there are multiple universes each with a different version of us in them ! I cannot believe physicists have let these people run with these stupid ideas which have no basis other than in science fiction movies. Why is a science pandering to Hollywood?
There are NO BLACK HOLES …THERE ARE NO GRAVITY WAVES …ELECTRONS TRAVEL IN THEIR ORBITS AT (π÷2) x speed of LIGHT (PHOTONS) ….THEIR IS NO NORTH or SOUTH POLE …MAGNETISM IS THE EFFECT OF OBJECTS with MASS TRAVELING IN A CIRCLE/ORBIT …LEFT HAND GENERATOR RULE ….GRAVITY IS NOT AN ATTRACTION …IT IS A PUSH BY PARTICLES 7 to 8 times smaller then electrons ….electron mass is 1 ÷ 1836.1526745 x10¹⁸ lighter then a PROTON …..AREA COVERED BY AN ELECTRON = 1,836.1526745 x AREA PROTON ….describing a 2 DIMENSIONAL OBJECT ….or ….A PROTON IS A CONDENSED VERSION OF ELECTRONS ….MASS ELECTRONS/ MASS PROTONS = AREA PROTONS/AREA ELECTRONS ….GRAVITY IS A "PUSH" BY tinier particles …THIS "PUSH" CAN BE REDUCED BY Permanent MAGNETS or electric coil magnets (ELECTRO MAGNETS ) ….
Carroll for Prez!
Yes, but the equations are models, and sometimes that is forgotten and we just assume that everywhere they lead is correct. You have to check.
“Little concrete poem” = Math 👍
This guy always sounds to me like some bizarre love child of Fozzy Bear and Kermit the frog!
{:o:O:}
This is a damn good rundown of that entire field and the interplay between math and imagination
Atoms are so small that you can only see them if you're really drunk.
RUBBISH. SEE STEPHEN CORUTHERS
Something to consider:
Theoretical science usually goes by finding missing pieces of math. For example, the formula for gravity is essentially the same as electrostatics (magnets and particles) on the law of attraction where it gets exponentially larger the closer two attractive/repelling forces are with the difference being gravity must have a much larger scale to have the same force as magnets/particles. Where the theory goes is that you have positive and negative charges in electrostatics, but you only have one type of known force for gravity, meaning that there should technically be a pushing force of gravity, which is where we get our ideas of cloaking devices and more recently, our ideas of UFO/advanced propulsion.
Bingo- needs to be broadcast🔬📐
Einstein was right about the Big Bang. It never happened. The James web telescope proved that.
I find it fascinating that we are glibly spouting how much of what we thought we knew about the nature of the universe's "big picture" is wrong.😂
Another mortal fool taking credit for someone else's work