By the end of 2026, 25-30% of all medical visits to the United States can be carried out through telemedicine. Although the telemedicine acceptance indicator was low in 2024, it should increase significantly with the regulatory support of the US Congress.
The ScienceSoft research team analyzed industry statistics, current development and restrictions on teeth regulations, and opinions of healthcare community leaders to present a brand new take a look at the future of teeth in the USA.
Why shouldn’t you give in to telemedicine
Due to the blockage enforced during the Covid-19 pandemic, American health care systems quickly adapted to distant health services that allowed patients to care, while minimizing the risk of infections. Federal provisions have been relaxed, and the policy of the calling background was prolonged, encouraging suppliers to broadly include telemedicine services.
Fast ahead several years, and the speech reception dropped to about 4 to six% (as reported CMS AND EpicAccordingly), despite the incontrovertible fact that its use in the US was at the next level than before Pandemia. At the same time, in some areas, equivalent to mental health, the use of telemedicine remained high: 38% On all visits to mental health in 2023, it was carried out remotely.
We imagine that resistant use of mental health shows that the obligatory technology and demand are already on the spot. Key obstacles to receiving telemedicine are related to regulations reasonably than technological barriers or lack of demand. Along with the persistent efforts of the American medical community, the US Congress will probably permanently extend and improve existing teeth policy.
Key failures and teeth supporters in 2025: Facts and confidential opinions
Most American hospitals have already got technology, but rural areas are combating a slow web connection
The slow reception of telemedicine is unquestionably not a matter of teeth availability. According to the implementation of hospital technology with Final healthcareFrom February 2024, 78.6% of hospitals in the United States installed a telemedicine solution.
While hospitals have the obligatory software, access to a broadband connection stays a barrier to patients in rural and underestimated areas. For these people, visits only from sound are only as necessary as video connections. In fact, data from US Government Health Policy Office It reveals that nearly half of all the matzdrowia meetings in July and August 2022 were only on the sound.
The mental health sector jumps to the adoption of telemedicine
According to other medical specialties, in 2023, in accordance with telemedicine in mental health, it was greater than thrice higher than in other medical specialties Epic research. We imagine that the resistant demand for telemedicine in mental health indicates that technology will remain.
A everlasting demand for online mental health services fueled the attention of investors. According to KPMG report In the field of fusion and acquisitions in the field of Mental Health Services, Private Equity show interest in investing in the Terazdrowia platform that supply mental health services.
The increase in the use of telemedicine during the pandemic stimulated the party e-relief In mental health, and the trend remained even after the explosion. According to Trillant HealthIn the third quarter of 2023, the Presidency of E constituted about one third of antidepressant prescriptions. When e-reluctant patients with mental health problems, they might avoid unnecessary personal visits that could cause additional fear. This option can also be obligatory for patients who cannot travel to frequent personal visits resulting from barriers equivalent to distance, cost, childcare or skilled duties.
The important obstacle to the development of the teeth in the USA is the lack of government support
After analyzing the regulatory landscape around telemedicine, we got here to the conclusion that the future of its acceptance-not meaninglessly on whether it continues to be growing or returning to pretendemic levels-in a big extent will depend on government decision-makers.
Relaxation of teether regulations introduced during the pandemic was prolonged until December 31, 2024. However, his fate is unclear because, in accordance with Congress Budget OfficeNew extensions would cause a surplus of Medicare expenditure value USD 2 billion. Nevertheless, we will see the joint effort of the healthcare community permanently extend Several teeth policies outside December 2024.
According to AMA guide For proper use of telemedicine, the adoption of teethdrowia slows down the lack of financial profitability. In this regard, The state provisions are halfway to fulfill the needs of the healthcare community. As of January 3, 2025, almost half of the US states implemented the payment Parity policyensuring that the teether services are returned at the same pace as personal visits. If other countries follow a general trend, this may increasingly develop into a pursuit of telemedicine adoption.
However, inter -state regulations remain a challenge for each patients and suppliers. According to Cicero Institute, an impartial organization of public policy, from January 2024 27 US states (54%) didn’t allow the practice of inter -state teo. . History of Maki InadaThe biology professor from New York illustrates the impracticality of the situation: her Boston cancer specialists required her in Massachusetts to go to Telemedicine. The hospital suggested that he could “simply” go five and a half hours to the limit of state and conduct a session from the automobile.
Industry representatives are rigorously optimistic about the teether
Many experts in the industry imagine that the adoption of telemedicine during the pandemic was unnatural, and in the future it should be more gradual, because society needs time to adapt to those changes. “It will take another five years to see that they will increase to 50% to 70%, which we saw at the beginning of the pandemic,” predicts Eyal Zimlichman, director of innovation and transformation at the Sheba Medical Center.
At the same time, interest in recent ways of providing care through innovation of teens is growing. Ateeev MehrotraA professor of healthcare policy at Blavatnik Institute in HMS believes that technological progress is slowly changing the way we define medicine practice. The striking example of this transformation comes from Dubai, in which the MedCare healthcare supplier has recently launched his first Hospital in Metaverse. As a digital twin of a physical hospital, it allows patients to experience their services before traveling to physical space, including consultation with doctors in VR.
As telemedicine transforms healthcare in the era after a visit: Realistic appearance
Suppliers see the next patient capability and lower costs for a visit
Telemedicine significantly optimizes the use of resources in healthcare facilities. Remote monitoring of patients (RPM) allows suppliers to create the equivalent of “virtual beds”, enabling treatment of more patients without increasing their physical abilities. This model generates more revenues with the same or reduced use of resources. According to McKinsey report From May 2023, virtual hospitals in Australia reduced care costs by as much as 19% due to telemedicine.
In addition, telemedicine smoothes the patient’s flow, offering greater flexibility in planning. Instead of contributing to peak demand in the morning and evenings, patients can book visits during the day, making a more balanced burden of employees.
At the same time, as telemedicine increases, older healthcare employees who’ve been practicing in traditional, nose to nose for a long time, can face the challenge of adapting to recent technologies. To support this transition, healthcare organizations can have to implement efficient, available training programs that help these practices construct trust in the use of Terazdrowia tools. Ensuring that telemedicine platforms have a user -friendly and intuitive project is one other technique to minimize technological barriers and cognitive loads for clinicians.
Patients have higher care availability, but they encounter the risk of alienation without personal visits
Telemedicine makes care more accessible to rural and underestimated areas, where there are few physical objects. If the inter -state regulations develop into more flexible, patient selections will expand along with specialist care and suppliers outside their geographical location.
A reduced journey to healthcare facilities means less exposure to potential health threats to patients and people who may encounter while traveling. Patients with chronic states can make the most of continuous monitoring and regular control, helping them manage their health proactively. In addition, online consultations may ensure a certain degree of anonymity not available during personal visits, which is a key advantage for patients looking for help in social stigmatized areas, equivalent to mental health.
However, telemedicine is related to challenges. The biggest is a possible reduction of overall quality of care. Excessive depend on technology can result in the patient’s reluctance to the hospital’s personal visit, which can prevent caregivers from noticing critical signs of the disease that’s best detected during physical tests. This lack of face -to -face interaction may result in patients who will not be so accountable for compliance with prescribed treatment plans as possible, with traditional family medicine.
Payers reduce the severity of claims at the expense of lower transparency
Increased availability of care makes preventive and health monitoring more convenient and cheap to patients, which might encourage them to care frequently. As a result, insurers could observe a discount in frequency and severity of claims, especially if telemedicine helps reduce expensive visits to the ambulance in unlimited issues. In this fashion, telemedicine has the potential for significant cost savings in claims payments.
However, telemedicine can also be some risk to insurers. The distant nature of the teeth allows for the possibility of false claims, since it is harder to see if there was a visit of telemedicine.
