Sigma 24-70 mm F2.8 DG DN II | Art vs. 28-105 mm F2.8 DG DN | Piece
2024 was an important yr for Sigma. With the release of a brand new one 28-105 mm F2.8 DG DN | PieceSigma has increased the selection of lenses for mirrorless people for a wider audience of users, filling the void for the creators who were counting on an extended version of the classic 24-70 mm lens.
But there are various users who also want this traditional focal range with the latest technology. 24-70 mm F2.8 DG DN | The art was updated in September 2024. 24-70 mm F2.8 DG DN II | Piece It has been strengthened in virtually all areas and is sort of the same price as his predecessor.
But which lens is my favorite? It is difficult to decide on, but I hope that the photos that I earned with the help of these two unusual lenses will help to come to a decision on the winner.
First, a physical comparison
Since the introduction of lenses specially produced for full -frame mirrorless cameras, Sigma has made progress to cut back the form of the form of its lenses without compromise for image quality. . 28-105 mm F2.8 DG DN | Piece and 24-70 mm F2.8 DG DN II | Piece Certainly follow this trend with relatively compact dimensions, bearing in mind the range and maximum lens opening.
For aurora for auroras for Auroras
On October 10, 2024, we were blessed with a tremendous Aurora Borealis color show with a heavy geomagnetic storm (KP9 on a scale), which shocked people throughout the country. Both photographers and amateurs witnessed this spectacular event in their very own courtyards! The storm was so intense that folks from New Jersey were in a position to see the dancing lights over the panorama of NYC.
The image below was captured from Bear Mountain, Garrison, and New York. This area has significant light pollution and I used to be still in a position to witness the northern lights with the naked eye. It actually was the best I’ve ever seen!
I used it for this unique event SIGMA 28-105 mm F2.8 DG DN | Piece The lens, for no other reason than I desired to be prepared in case I needed an extended focal length, but I’m sure that 24-70 mm can be equally effective.
To travel
When I travel, it will probably be difficult to come to a decision which lenses I intend to take with me. Recently, I normally take one of these enlarges F2.8 during my trips for various reasons. The decisive consider some cases could also be size and weight. If I’m on an extended day and I only need one lens, I’ll normally bring 24-70 mm F2.8 DG DN II | Piece. Coming to only 735g In the case of the e-contact version, this lens is barely easier to wear for an extended time.
He wore 28-105 mm for an extended time.
For comets
When Sigma announced 28-105 mm F2.8 DG DN II | PieceI used to be glad to get a replica of this lens on time to capture images of exciting latest comet (comet C/2023 A3 Tsuchinshan-Atlas). The focal range is good for grasping the comet with many perspectives. I like to have this everlasting F2.8 hole with any focal length – especially in the case of astrophotography.
For a milky way
I used to be enthusiastic about trying each these lenses in the case of astrophotography. The night sky is one of my favorite topics that they catch while traveling, and each of these lenses have a perfect focal range to photograph different scenes on the night sky.
To urban beggars
During the last supermoon in 2024 I made a decision to try Sigma 24-70 mm F2.8 DG DN II | Piece for this composition. I used 150-600 mm F5-6.3 DG dn os | Sports Separately for this scene, but I wanted something wider on my other body of the camera. Of course, I could also use 28-105 mm in this example, but I wanted to do this lens and I used to be impressed by the results!
For candidates and portraits
Both of these lenses are incredible options for honest photos and portraits attributable to the flexibility of the focal range. If you’re a portrait, wedding or street photographer, each lenses serve their purpose thoroughly. Bokeh shall be more pronounced on 28-105 mm F2.8 DG DN | Piece When you shoot the lens at the long end attributable to perspective compression, but as mentioned earlier, 24-70 mm F2.8 DG DN II | Piece It is simpler to travel and has somewhat advantage at a large end.
Even for wild nature
. Autofocus performance From each these artistic lenses it’s neat and accurate. I used Sony A7R V with recognition of the theme of animals/bird to capture wild nature with 24-70 mm F2.8 DG DN II | Piece. I made a decision to make use of this lens to see how the results shall be because the central range was limited at the long end. As it seems, I didn’t really want an extended focal length from 28-105 mm for these specific individuals with wildlife.
Closing thoughts
I exploit each of these lenses from their release and I’m very sure that I can use one of them in virtually any situation. Both of these lenses have exceptional image quality. Benefits from a lighter mass and a wider focal length from 24-70 mm F2.8 DG DN II | Piece They are attractive, but a further range with 28-105 mm F2.8 DG DN | Piece It is basically impressive with this fixed F2.8 hole. Ultimately, for some reasons, because they each perfectly serve their goal for each script.
Of course, along with the lens function, there may be a difference of several hundred dollars between these two artistic lenses, which may affect the creator’s decision. Ultimately, it really is dependent upon the items you shoot the most to make the final decision, and I hope that the examples I give can enable you lead you in the right direction. Personally, I actually wish to use each of these lenses. I am unable to select one above the other!
Get a zoom that matches well
Both lenses available for Sony E-money and L-Mount
